Firing Up – Old-School Appreciation

By Nick Licata

With all aftermarket parts available today to make our classic Chevy muscle cars hit corners like a modern track fiend and at the same time drive as smooth as a new La-Z-Boy Talladega Rocking Recliner (yep, it’s a real thing. Google it.) there are plenty of holdouts who prefer to keep their car’s technology in or near to the decade it was born … and I, for one, totally dig it.

- Advertisement -

Now, I’m all for employing the latest technology available to help make our vintage cars handle and perform to the best of their ability. Heck, my ’71 Camaro has LS power and updated aftermarket suspension and brakes, yet I can’t help but also love cars clinging to the spirit of the late ’60s and early ’70s. I especially admire the guys who build gasser-style cars and are willing to give up some driveability in pursuit of period-correctness. That’s dedication. Thankfully, their desire to preserve automotive history enables the older hot rodders to fondly look back on the past while offering the younger generation of hot rodders a peek at what it was like. With that said, should cars built with the influence of a bygone era comply to the past in every aspect? When referencing brakes and suspension, I think it makes sense to give up some nostalgia for safety. The aftermarket enables today’s engines to make big horsepower compared to what was available 50 years ago, which makes these cars go faster than ever with ease. So, it’s imperative they stop quicker with little effort, as well.

When it comes to powering these nostalgia hot rods, should we draw a line where only small- or big-block engines be allowed? I’ve seen LS power in plenty of Pro Street cars—some dressed in big- and small-block attire, while others blatantly let that LS flag fly.

Does a ’55 Chevy built in gasser motif need to abide by the same loose rules when it comes to the powerplant, or is that car held to a higher standard underhood? I’m pretty sure just about every muscle car purist would consider it sacrilege to power a vintage straight-axle car with an LS engine. But would it get a pass if a carburetor or eight-stack injection system were part of the mix? What if small- or big-block–style valve covers and some other old-school–looking accoutrements were on board? Asking for a friend. Seriously, would using a more-efficient mill absolutely destroy the spirit of the build? That same friend would like to know.

- Advertisement -

Being born in the ’60s and attending drag races at a young age is likely to blame for my attraction to the Gassers and A/FX drag cars, yet being so closely involved with today’s aftermarket I can’t help but embrace the newest parts designed to make our classics drive like late-model sports cars. Thankfully, we live in a time when we can have our cake and eat it, too!

All this cake talk is making me hungry. You in?

See All My “Firing Up” Series Here>>>

- Advertisement -

Related Articles

Search Our Site

More Chevy Performance

Assembly Required

Final Assembly and Trim Installation on a Slick 1966...


James Wiley’s ’64 Chevy II Nova Project By Tommy Lee...

Reducing the Wallow of a Wagon

Brake and Suspension Upgrades Make a Handier Handyman By Ryan...

Clutch Basics

The Fusible Friction Link Between Your Engine and the...

Blue Blood

Anthony Cacioppo’s 1971 Camaro is Almost Above the Law By...

Firing UP – Cultural Diversity

By Nick Licata Living in Orange County, California, I’m exposed...
More Chevy Performance

Hydraulics for Your Left Foot

A New Idea for Hydraulic Clutch Release That Will...

Side Hustle

Dave Timm’s Homebuilt 1968 Nova By Nick Licata   -   Photography...

Exam Time!

We Test Multiple Holley LS Intake Manifolds on the...

Chevelle Dreams

One Man's Passion Turns Into His Drive to Build...

The World’s Fairest

This Day Two Resto 1965 Chevelle Has Lived its...

Vettes with a View

Corvettes and Chevy Muscle Cars Invade the Great Smoky...