For most, our first foray in the world of fabrication, at least as far as welding is concerned, took place at the business end of a MIG (Metal Inert Gas) welder. Arguably the easiest and cheapest method out there, it makes sense that many of us cut our teeth on the process. But as our skillset improves and the demand for a certain level of quality increases, the MIG method starts to lose its luster. Control is minimal, the process is messy, and the end result can leave something to be desired. There are many instances where MIG welding is perfectly acceptable, but very few where it exceeds the results of its advanced cousin, TIG welding.
- Advertisement -
While MIG welding takes some technique to master, the process is literally “point and shoot.” With the gun positioned properly in relation to the workpiece (typically over the joint), a button is pushed and filler wire is automatically fed from the machine into the joint, while simultaneously carrying a preset amount of amperage set to melt or fuse the materials at a predetermined temperature. This results in a joint where the two workpieces are fused together as one thanks to the filler wire. In this case, two methods of control are available from the machine: amperage setting and wire speed. Both settings are typically based on material and thickness (the thinner the material, the lower the setting). Too high an amperage setting will result in melting the base metal before the filler wire (blow-through) while too low will result in the filler wire melting before the base metal, resulting in the filler wire piling on top of the base metal, potentially not even fusing to it. Similarly, too slow a wire feed setting results in the wire melting at a rate faster than it feeds into the base metal, resulting in a non-existent weld, while too fast will feed too much wire into the weld pool before it has a chance to melt and fuse, resulting in a “kick-back” feeling on the gun (instead of the wire melting and fusing with the base metal, it remains solid and literally pushes the gun away). A few other variables, such as technique (like travel speed) and filler wire size, also contribute to a successful MIG weld, but the amount of control on most machines is limited to the amp and wire feed settings, hindering the process.
TIG (Tungsten Inert Gas) welding, also known as GTAW (Gas Tungsten Arc Welding), like AN fasteners and fittings, is another by-product of World War II. Developed as a method for welding magnesium components in the aerospace industry, TIG welding is accomplished by flooding the weld area with an inert gas (typically Argon) and sending an electric arc from a Tungsten electrode in the TIG torch to the workpiece. Filler rod (typically composed of a similar metallurgy as the workpiece) is then introduced to weld the two components together. An initial amperage is again set at the machine, but with the TIG process it can be “throttled” up and down by way of a foot pedal. This makes the TIG process more than just a handful, but a handful and a foot! It helps to be a bit ambidextrous, and a little rhythm doesn’t hurt either, as the dab and move handiwork is better accomplished in tandem.
- Advertisement -
This increase of coordination is what makes TIG welding more difficult to learn, yet alone master, which is why most DIYers stick to the MIG process. The introductory cost is also higher, since most TIG machines are more advanced and have an increase of features over the wire-fed alternative. There are a similar number of consumables between the two, with the TIG process requiring slightly fewer. MIG welding consumables consist of the shielding gas, filler wire, and contact tip. The gas and wire are constant consumables while the contact tips are replaced as required, though the process tends to foul these up pretty regularly due to the slag it puts out. Consumables on the TIG welding side consist of shielding gas, filler rod or wire, and tungsten electrodes. Like the MIG process, gas and filler rod are constantly consumed, while the tungsten electrode gets consumed at a lesser rate as the user’s experience increases.
At the end of the day, both processes can yield a satisfactory result for most home builders, but if a higher degree of workability (hammer and dollying for example), quality (MIG welding produces slag while TIG does not), and consistency is desired, or if a wider range of materials is being used, TIG welding might be the way to go.
As a regular user of the TIG process here at Clampdown Competition headquarters, we’ve discovered a few tips and tricks that might help the beginner as well as the experienced TIG welder that we thought we’d share, combined with an overall look at the components required. A few will be givens to those with more seat time, while others will hopefully help the new and old alike. ACP